Marcellus Shale US

Terms of Use

Home

Contact

MARCELLUS
SHALE

2005 Energy Act

Air Testing

Before you Lease

Compressor Station

Diesel Idling

Engaged Citizens

Fracking

Gas Pipelines

Gas Production

Glossary

Impoundments

Intro to Marcellus

Report Violations

Solar Power

Videos

SHALE GAS
PLAYS

North America

Utica Shale

DRILLING
WASTE

Gas Drilling Waste

Shale Wastewater

 

Some refer to this as the "Halliburton Loophole"

Halliburton frac fluid
Halliburton frac fluid on a tractor
trailer near Buffalo, Pa.

 
 
 

Key paragraphs from the
ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005

SEC. 322. HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.
Paragraph (1) of section 1421(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h(d)) is amended to read as follows:
‘‘(1) UNDERGROUND INJECTION.—The term ‘underground injection’—
‘‘(A) means the subsurface emplacement of fluids by well injection; and
‘‘(B) excludes—
‘‘(i) the underground injection of natural gas for purposes of storage; and
‘‘(ii) the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities.’’.

SEC. 323. OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION DEFINED.
Section 502 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(24) OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION.—The term ‘oil and gas exploration, production, processing, or treatment operations or transmission facilities’ means all field activities or operations associated with exploration, production, processing, or treatment operations, or transmission facilities, including activities necessary to prepare a site for drilling and for the movement and placement of drilling equipment, whether or not such field activities or operations may be considered to be construction activities.’’.


FRESHER ACT OF 2015

Focused Reduction of Effluence and Stormwater runoff through Hydrofracking Environmental Regulation Act of 2015

Title: To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and to direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study with respect to stormwater runoff from oil and gas operations, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Focused Reduction of Effluence and Stormwater runoff through Hydrofracking Environmental Regulation Act of 2015” or the “FRESHER Act of 2015”.

SEC. 2. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM OIL, GAS, AND MINING OPERATIONS.

(a) Limitation on Permit Requirement.—Section 402(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(l)) is amended—

(1) by striking paragraph (2);

(2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); and

(3) in paragraph (2)(C) (as so redesignated), by striking “402(l)(3)(A)” each place it appears and inserting “subparagraph (A)”.

(b) Definitions.—Section 502 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended—

(1) by striking paragraph (24); and

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (25) and (26) as paragraphs (24) and (25), respectively.

(c) Study.—

(1) In general.—The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a study of stormwater impacts with respect to any area that the Secretary determines may be contaminated by stormwater runoff associated with oil or gas operations, which shall include an analysis of—

(A) measurable contamination in the area;

(B) ground water resources in the area; and

(C) the susceptibility of aquifers in the area to contamination from stormwater runoff associated with the oil or gas operations.

(2) Report.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1).


FRACKING BEYOND THE LAW
Despite Industry Denials, Investigation Reveals Continued
Use of Diesel Fuels in Hydraulic Fracturing

At least 33 companies drilled 351 wells in 12 states using prohibited diesel fuels without required permits in violation
of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act

Website:
http://environmentalintegrity.org/archives/6940

Report PDF:
http://environmentalintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/Fracking-Beyond-the-Law.pdf

Well Data:
http://environmentalintegrity.org/archives/6934 


Halliburton fracking chemicals
'Fracking Convention' in Greene County, Pa.
 

Carns Unit getting fracked
Fracking Washington County, Pa Marcellus Shale wells
 

Hydraulic fracturing chemicals
Frac chemicals in Beaver County, Pa.
 


Public Citizen’s Analysis of the Domenici-Barton Energy Policy Act of 2005

OIL & GAS REGULATORY ROLLBACKS

Section 322

"Exempts from the Safe Drinking Water Act a coalbed methane drilling technique called “hydraulic fracturing,” a potential polluter of underground drinking water. One of the largest companies employing this technique is Halliburton, for which Vice President Richard Cheney acted as chief executive officer in the 1990s. This exemption would kill lawsuits by Western ranchers who say that drilling for methane gas pollutes groundwater by injecting contaminated fluids underground. Only 16 companies stand to significantly benefit from this exemption from clean water laws: Anadarko, BP, Burlington Resources, ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips, Devon Energy, Dominion Resources, EOG Resources, Evergreen Resources, Halliburton, Marathon Oil, Oxbow (Gunnison Energy), Tom Brown, Western Gas Resources, Williams Cos and XTO. These companies gave nearly $15 million to federal candidates—with more than three-quarters of that total going to Republicans. Moreover, the 16 companies spent more than $70 million lobbying Congress.

Source:
Public Citizen
www.citizen.org


Halliburton frac truck in West Virginia
Halliburton truck in Hundred, West Virginia
September 30, 2007 photo
  


Homepage     Terms of use
Copyright ©2009-2016
Marcellus-Shale.us
All rights reserved.