|
| |
|
|
WANTED: Water
Massive quantities needed.
All
sources may apply!
|
 |
Water hoses are used so often by tanker
trucks
to siphon water from Chartiers Creek
that the hoses are left on the bank
|
|
|
LAWMAKER CHALLENGES
PENNSYLVANIA DEP'S REPORTING OF GAS WELL WATER SAFETY
By Don Hopey
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
November 2, 2012
- The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection produces
incomplete lab reports and uses them to dismiss complaints that
Marcellus Shale gas development operations have contaminated
residential water supplies and made people sick, according to court
documents. In response, state Rep. Jesse White, D-Cecil, Thursday
called on state and federal agencies to investigate the DEP for
"alleged misconduct and fraud" revealed by sworn depositions in a
civil case currently in Washington County Common Pleas Court."This
is beyond outrageous," Mr. White said. "Anyone who relied on the DEP
for the truth about whether their water has been impacted by
drilling activities has apparently been intentionally deprived of
critical health and safety information by their own government."
************
MORE:
The letter sent
to Rep. White alerting him of these issues can be found at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111821139
The deposition of
TaruUpadhyay, technical director of PA DEP Laboratory can be found
at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111821978
FOR FARMS IN THE
WEST,
OIL WELLS ARE THIRSTY RIVALS
September 5, 2012
- GREELEY, Colo. — A new race for water is rippling through the
drought-scorched heartland, pitting farmers against oil and gas
interests, driven by new drilling techniques that use powerful
streams of water, sand and chemicals to crack the ground and release
stores of oil and gas. A single such well can require five million
gallons of water, and energy companies are flocking to water
auctions, farm ponds, irrigation ditches and municipal fire hydrants
to get what they need.
Story
MORE WATER
PROTECTION FROM MARCELLUS SHALE SUGGESTED FOR PENNSYLVANIA
April 16, 2012 -
A former top environmental official says Pennsylvania's successful
efforts to keep Marcellus Shale wastewater away from drinking water
supplies should be extended to other oil and gas drillers. "It's the
same industry. It is the same contaminants. And the goal should be
the same," said George Jugovic Jr., former southwest regional
director of the Department of Environmental Protection and president
of PennFuture, an environmental group.
An Associated
Press analysis of state data found that in the second half of 2011,
about 1.86 million barrels — or about 78 million gallons — of
drilling wastewater from conventional oil and gas wells were still
being sent to treatment plants that discharge into rivers.
Story
METHANE, BARIUM,
METALS & SALTS
April 18, 2012 – The Pa.
Department of Environmental Protection did not include any
information in the cover letter to the test results - or any flags
in the lab report - outlining the hazards detected in the water:
methane at double the concentration when it begins to seep out of
water into the air, creating an explosion risk, and barium at more
than twice state and federal safe drinking water limits.
The water also contained
elevated levels of aluminum, manganese, iron, turbidity, total
dissolved solids and chloride - all of which have limits set for
aesthetic, not health, reasons - but the department did not
highlight those parameters in the lab report or outline them in the
cover letter.
Story
UPDATE ON
WATER WELLS
Here are some excerpts from
Bryan Swistock of Penn State in a June 21, 2010 Press Release
following the Clearfield County gas well blowout that spewed
contaminated water for 15 hours:
June 21, 2010 - Bryan Swistock, senior extension associate in the
School of Forest Resources, said the state Department of
Environmental Protection will probably check local streams for
contamination, but it may be prudent for water-well owners living
near the spill to have an independent laboratory test their well
water. He said the tests for various contaminants have a range of
costs and implications.
"Things like methane, chloride, total dissolved
solids and barium are very good indicators and are relatively
inexpensive to test for -- most labs can do them," Swistock
explained. "When you move down into the organic chemicals that might
be used in fracturing, the cost to test for them goes way up."
"It's hard to document anything if you don't have
any pre-existing data," he added. "It's important that homeowners
have an unbiased expert from a state-certified lab conduct the
tests, in case the sample results are needed for legal action."
Certainly, water supplies within 1,000 feet of the
drilling are considered at higher risk. Beyond that, it's up to the
homeowner to decide.
Webmaster's note:
It is advisable for those with water wells close to proposed
drilling (within 2,500 feet) to have "split sample testing"
done by a certified water lab. In other words, pay to have a
certified water lab obtain a water sample from your well at the same
time the drilling company is drawing their "pre-drill" sample. One
such water lab is Pocono Labs.
These results will be invaluable if you end up in court with a
drilling company over water well contamination. Have the most
complete water testing done that you can afford. Water tests
including VOC's (volatile organic compounds) will be more expensive.
Your water test HAS to be taken by a certified tech and the "chain
of custody" needs documented to be of value in court.
"Post-drill" well water testing needs to be done within 6 months of
drilling in Pennsylvania to be valid under mid-2010 regulations.
WHAT SHOULD YOUR WATER TEST INCLUDE?
It can get expensive to test for a long list of contaminants,
so here is a short list of things you should test your water for
first:
Eight additional test items to consider:
-
Aluminum
-
Arsenic
-
Bromide
-
Iron
-
Manganese
-
Lead
-
Strontium
-
Sulfate
|
| |
|
WATER WITHDRAWALS
May 12, 2009 through July 15, 2014 -
These water
management plans have been approved by the PA DEP. The plans
include a
water withdrawal plan for Cross Creek, Cross Creek Lake and Chartiers Run,
in Washington County.
There is also a plan for Whiteley Creek in Greene County, as well as
four commercial hydrants through Pennsylvania American Water Company
in Washington County.
Photos taken September 23, 2009

Water withdrawals and a "leaky gate" have
affected this dock at Cross Creek Lake

Rocky shoreline near picnic tables is exposed

Cross Creek Lake boat launch area has changed drastically
Range Resources Water Management Plan summary:
800,000 gallons per day from Cross Creek Lake
200,000 gallons per day from Cross Creek
200,000 gallons per day from Chartiers Run
200,000 gallons per day from Whiteley Creek
2,592,000 gallons from four PAWC hydrants
Total = 3,992,000 gallons of water per day from all sources
Almost 4-million gallons of
water per day (3,992,000) can be withdrawn from the Ohio River Basin
watershed in two counties by Range Resources through July 15,
2014.
NOTE: This amount only
includes Range Resources water withdrawals and does not include
de-watering of the Ohio River Basin by other drilling companies.
Example: Eastern American Energy Corp.
also has an approved water plan for withdrawal of 200,000 gallons of
water per day from Whiteley Creek.
Eastern American Energy Corporation Water Management Plan for
Whiteley Creek
(PDF - 210KB)
Whiteley Creek, Whiteley Township, Greene County, Penna.

Water Management Plans for SW Pennsylvania Region
48.5 million gallons per day from 10 counties
of the Monongahela/Ohio River watershed!
|
| |
|
PENNSYLVANIA ACT 220 - Signed March 26, 2009
|
NEW PLAN
OUTLINES STATEWIDE, REGIONAL PRIORITIES TO BALANCE
COMPETING DEMANDS FOR WATER
As demand
grows for Pennsylvania’s water resources, the
commonwealth is offering comprehensive
recommendations to help policymakers balance the
demands of competing interests while protecting the
quality and supply of water for residents and
businesses.
|
The
following goals have been identified by the Ohio Regional Water
Resources Committee due to specific concerns regarding water quality
and quantity in the region. These issues should be factored into any
decisions that are made that may impact water resources, as we plan
for the protection and restoration of water resources in the region.
Distinguish the Ohio River Basin as a region that is
different from other basins in the state while conducting public
education and outreach on the importance of our water sources
Identify water resources needed to promote and
facilitate economic development, and provide job opportunities,
while maintaining watershed integrity and recreational benefits
Reduce and avoid impacts that may lead to
contamination of groundwater and surface water sources available for
residential water use
Develop plans for water resources during periods
of drought or other water shortage emergencies
Protect and restore water resources such as critical
groundwater recharge areas, ecologically sensitive watersheds,
aquifers, wellheads, lakes, wetlands and floodplains
Develop and encourage the use of appropriate, applied
technology to ensure clean and healthy water resources and
encourage water conservation practices
(Full
PDF document -Ohio Region Water Atlas) |
| |
Hydraulic fracturing of shale for gas has its own sets of issues
in each region of the United States. Some regions are short on water
but can easily get rid of wastewater. Other regions have lots of
water but no good way to get rid of the brine or "produced water." The second scenario
applies to Marcellus Shale gas drilling in Pennsylvania, and some early lessons
are being learned about the negative effects on drinking water sources.
Pennsylvania is considered to have an abundant supply of water,
especially around Pittsburgh. On the opposite end of the state,
Philadelphia tends to have more frequent summer droughts. The Allegheny River and
Monongahela River join at 'the Point' in Pittsburgh to form the Ohio
River. Until the past couple of years, when the amount of hydraulic fracturing
increased in Western Pennsylvania, water quantity was rarely an
issue.

Looking back
During the 20th century Pittsburgh rivers became polluted from
all the heavy industry present, while Pittsburgh became the Steel
City, and this water pollution included acid mine drainage due to a
very
active coal mining industry. During the 2005 Bassmaster fishing
event on Pittsburgh rivers it was reported how much cleaner the
rivers were than a decade or two ago. Anglers were favorably
impressed. Increased fish populations reflected these improvements
in the river water quality.
In early 2011, it was reported by a representative of the Pa.
Fish & Boat Commission that while the number of species of fish in
Pittsburgh rivers increased from 2005 to 2010, that the game fish
population declined.

Acid mine drainage has brightly colored this stream south of Pittsburgh
One frac over the line
Environmental gains with Pittsburgh rivers have now started to
reverse themselves since Marcellus Shale drilling began. This change
became evident in 2008 as the hydraulic fracturing of wells began to
ramp up. The problem stems from two issues.
The first problem is the massive quantities of water needed to frac
each gas well, somewhere between 2 million and 6 million gallons.
This water can be taken from any stream, lake, river or watershed in
western Pennsylvania, since there is minimal regulation
regarding water usage. Pittsburgh sorely needs a river basin
commission that is more than just a figurehead like ORSANCO. This heavy drawing-off of water has had a significant impact on water
levels, even in a water rich environment. Major problems began during the dry
summer and fall seasons that Pittsburgh experienced in 2008.
| 3 Residual
Waste tankers pumping water from the stream in front of
the Washington County Firefighter Academy for a frac job
at the intersection of Lynn Portal Road and West Buffalo
Road. |
 |
| The water level
in the stream they are pumping from is running low due a
rainfall deficiency of
over 3-inches in the Pittsburgh area. July 11, 2009
photo |
The second problem is the continuing flow of acid mine drainage,
wildcat sewers, and other sources of contamination flowing into
Pittsburgh area waterways. Add to that all the gas drilling
wastewater that has been getting trucked to any waste treatment
plant that would accept it. The wastewater was then being processed
with various degrees of wastewater
treatment before getting dumped back in area waterways. All of these
sources (gas drilling wastewater, acid mine drainage, wildcat sewage
flow) contribute to a high TDS (total dissolved solids) level.
The bad marriage
When you lower river flow and increase TDS levels.... BINGO!
The serious problems begin. Gas drilling companies are contributing
to the problem on two levels,
and it has become the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.
Whatever fragile balance that existed with Pittsburgh river water in
the past has now been skewed by the increased drilling and
hydrofracing of horizontal
wells.
In early 2011, new concerns were announced due to the
radioactivity of Marcellus Shale wastewater from soluble radioactive
elements in the shale layer, including Ra 226.
Then they drink that water?
Did we forget to mention how many people around Pittsburgh get
their drinking water from the rivers? The Monongahela River ("Mon")
provides most of the area's drinking water to a large population of
residents. There were very few problems with water companies
providing drinking water within safety standards from Pittsburgh
rivers until Marcellus drilling increased.
Add to these concerns the frac chemicals pumped deep underground.
The manmade chemical mix joins the naturally occurring contaminants
in the shale (including high salt content) and this toxic cocktail
is put back into the waterways.
What this adds to drinking water sources doesn't even
account for inevitable run-off from well sites, accidents and spills.
Who's to say some of the wastewater isn't getting 'the midnight dump' on
local roads or into
local streams?

The Monongahela River in Pittsburgh is known as "The Mon"
Getting up to speed
As drinking water started to go bad around Pittsburgh, there were
some quick knee-jerk reactions. Some waste treatment plants that
didn't have the proper facilities to process this industrial grade
wastewater (consisting of a salty high brine content, frac fluids and
heavy metals, just to name a few) were told they could no longer accept any produced
water. This news really hurt the bottom line of some waste plants
going through
tough financial times, since several plants were reaping the
financial rewards of treating additional wastewater. (There are at least
20 new wastewater plants in the planning stage for Pennsylvania).
In early 2009, the Pennsylvania DEP announced the installation of a
new network of river monitors that would alert them to high-TDS
levels. If the DEP can't control it at its source, why not monitor it and write a
report on it? We'll see what this new program actually ends up
accomplishing. At least it will raise public awareness of the
problem which may eventually lead to reforms in the existing bad
practices.
As Yogi said, "it's Deja Vu
all over again"
We've now seen our first case of gas drilling creating a problem
with drinking water
in 2009, and it's just the beginning of summer, when tap water
demands increase. On June 19th, the Tri-County Joint Municipal
Authority alerted their 3,300 water customers to high levels of TTHMs (total trihalomethanes) in their tap water. Below is a
copy of
that letter:
|
|
 |
After seeing the water report above, one local water expert
offered the
following comments:
"Not good
at all. Trihalomethanes (THM) can cause cancer, and some research
has also linked it to miscarriages. Very unusual to see a public
drinking water system have an annual violation for this. It’s a
result of contaminants in the water reacting with the chlorine they
add at the drinking water treatment plant.
I know that DEP and the Allegheny County Health Department are both
aware that this is a potential problem that can happen when the
drilling wastewater gets chlorinated and used for drinking water.
...I don’t think anyone has reported an actual THM violation
previously.
On the 'what people should do right now level' – a Brita (carbon)
filter will take out THM, I’m pretty sure. But be aware that
most
of your exposure is from showering, not drinking the water. The
steam in your shower will cause the THM to gas off out of the water
and into your lungs. Important to make sure your bathroom is well
ventilated."
|
Key items on the agenda of the
Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board (EQB)
meeting for May 19, 2010
|
Executive Summary - 25 PA Code Chapter 95 - Wastewater Treatment
Requirements
May 19, 2010 Pennsylvania EQB
Meeting Agenda
This final
rulemaking amends Chapter 95 (relating to wastewater treatment
requirements). The final form rulemaking includes the
elimination of a redundant provision, and the establishment of
new treatment requirements for new and expanding mass loadings
of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS).
The proposed
rulemaking was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on
November 7, 2009. See 39 Pa.B. 6467 (November 7,
2009). Public comments were accepted until February 12, 2010. In
addition, four (4) public hearings were held: December 14, 2009
in Cranberry Township, Butler County; December 15, 2009 in
Ebensburg, Cambria County; December 16 in Williamsport, Lycoming
County; and December 18, 2009 in Allentown, Lehigh County.
Prior to
recommending that the proposed regulation be provided to the
Environmental Quality Board, the Water Resources Advisory
Committee (WRAC) suggested that further examination be made
during the comment period to address two critical areas. WRAC
suggested the Department examine the costs of the proposed
regulation on the sectors that would be impacted, and the
technologies available to treat discharges high in TDS. WRAC
created the TDS Stakeholders Subcommittee to work in cooperation
with the Department on these issues.
The TDS
Stakeholders Subcommittee was tasked with examining the issue of
cost and technology, and was to make recommendations to WRAC for
submission to the Department in the form of formal comments on
the proposed regulation. The subcommittee was made up of members
of the various industries impacted as well as members of
interested environmental groups. The subcommittee met monthly
from August 2009 thru March 2010. During that timeframe various
sector groups presented their findings on the impact of the
proposed regulations to their industry or sector. The Department
worked closely with the TDS Subcommittee and has taken into
account the information presented and its recommendations in
developing the final rulemaking.
This final
form rulemaking protects the Commonwealth’s water resources from
new and expanded sources of TDS. Most importantly, the
rulemaking guarantees that waters of the Commonwealth will not
exceed a threshold of 500 mg/l. In doing so, the rulemaking
protects drinking water intakes on streams throughout the
Commonwealth and aquatic life resources, as well as maintains
continued economic viability of the current water users.
This final
form rulemaking differs from the proposed rulemaking in several
important respects. The differences are direct reflections of
concerns raised by industries that would be impacted by this
rulemaking. The rulemaking is responsive to these concerns,
resulting in an improved rule.
The changes
to the final form rulemaking are protective of our water
resources and are appropriately applied by industrial sector,
based on the potential impact of the specific sectors to our
receiving streams. While many existing industries throughout the
Commonwealth are of concern, the lower concentration and total
loading of most of those industries does not necessitate
treatment below a 2,000 mg/l threshold. A higher standard of 500
mg/l is being applied specifically to the natural gas sector,
based on several factors.
The most
significant rationale for this industry standard is the fact that
wastewaters resulting from the extraction of natural gas are of much
higher concentration and represent higher overall loadings when
compared to other industries. In other words, the effluent standard
does not dictate the treatment technology. Instead, selection of the
treatment technology is driven by the raw extraordinarily high
wastewater TDS concentration. Second, treatment technologies are
currently available and are being employed in Pennsylvania and other
states for the treatment of these wastewaters, in contrast to other
industries. Regulatory certainty provided with this final rule will
drive investment in and development of new technologies. Third, few
other states allow the discharge of these treated wastewaters to
their surface waters at all, dispelling any argument that
Pennsylvania is creating an economic disadvantage for this industry.
Fourth, the expansion of the industry into the Marcellus Shale is
new to the Commonwealth, and without TDS controls it could impact
existing industries, placing them at an economic disadvantage. The
potential for growth for Marcellus gas drilling within this sector
is enormous and should that growth be realized, the potential
impacts are just as enormous. Finally, this industry has shown an
ability to respond appropriately in addressing potential impacts to
our natural resources. Options currently exist for other disposal
pathways, including non-discharge options, and the creativity of the
industry only assures that additional disposal and treatment options
will flourish and allow for the continued expansion.
While the intent
of both the proposed and final rules is to address new, larger
sources of TDS, the proposed rulemaking focused upon controlling new
sources of “high-TDS” wastewater through defining these sources in
terms of those that were to be regulated (exempting by default those
that were not). In order to provide greater clarity to the scope of
the regulation, the final rulemaking takes the approach of
specifically exempting certain classes of TDS discharges from the
application of this rule. This approach is designed to clearly
exclude from the scope of this regulation all existing loadings of
TDS authorized by the Department prior to the effective date of this
regulation, as well as new and expanding TDS sources, which the
Department has determined are insignificant from a loading
perspective.
In addition,
based on Stakeholder comments received during a comprehensive public
participation process, the final rulemaking adopts a combination of
recommended approaches for addressing these larger loadings of TDS.
This combination of approaches includes an industrial sector-based
regulation along with a watershed-based analysis. The sector-based
piece focuses on the Oil and Gas Industry, promoting the reuse of
natural gas well flow back and the treatment of wastewater.
Treatment for wastewater that is not recycled or disposed in an
approved underground injection well must be performed at a
Centralized Wastewater Treatment facility (CWT) to the standards
contained in the proposed regulation. This approach sets treatment
requirements for natural gas well wastewaters based on available,
proven treatment technologies for this industry and takes cost into
consideration. These requirements will assure that any threat of
water pollution from this rapidly growing industry is prevented in
accordance with the mandate of the Clean Streams Law.
The Department
has reviewed all of the comments received and has determined that a
sector-by-sector approach to controlling TDS is appropriate.
High-TDS wastewaters from different industries present different
treatment challenges. Based on the need for regulation of a rapidly
expanding industry which generates wastewaters with extraordinarily
high levels of TDS and chlorides, the readily available proven
treatment technologies for this wastewater, the low costs associated
with treatment, and the overwhelming public comment in favor of a
standard for this industry, the proposed regulation has refined its
original focus on treatment for oil and gas wastewaters. The final
regulation now contains more specific treatment requirements for
wastewater generated from all natural gas drilling activities.
The final
regulation continues to prohibit any discharge of wastewater from
natural gas well activities into waters of the Commonwealth except
as authorized by § 95.10(b), and requires that such wastewater be
treated at Centralized Waste Treatment facilities (CWTs). The final
rule retains the CWT discharge limits for TDS, sulfates, chlorides,
barium and strontium contained in the proposed rule. In response to
comments, the final regulation adds a provision regarding reuse of
flowback or production fluids from natural gas wells, and specifies
that deep well injection of wastewater from natural gas wells must
comply with 25 Pa. Code § 78.18.
The Department
agrees with the comments that were received by various industries
pointing out that the proposed rule is a one-size-fits-all approach
that may not be appropriate. The final rulemaking addresses this
issue by establishing an effluent standard for sectors (other than
natural gas well operations) at 2,000 mg/l, and allows a variance
from this standard under certain conditions specific to the
watershed in which the discharge is located. This approach is
consistent with the federal regulatory approach that separates
technology-based, end-of-pipe requirements by industry sectors. This
approach further accounts for economic impacts by distinguishing
between new and existing sources of pollution, recognizing that new
sources can plan their operations factoring in the regulatory
requirements for wastewater treatment.
In summary, the
final rulemaking establishes a watershed based approach that allows
for use of assimilative capacity where available. Further, it
provides watershed monitoring of the TDS loadings in watersheds
statewide, and only imposes effluent limits on dischargers when the
loading within the water body is nearing the limit of assimilative
capacity. The final rulemaking establishes sector-based effluent
standards for the natural gas industry, and requires recycle and
reuse of fluids captured in the initial stages of well development.
Wastewater that cannot be reused must be transported to treatment
facilities that provide treatment to appropriate standards.
This final
rulemaking was presented to the WRAC on April 14, 2010. During this
discussion, WRAC members sought further clarification on the
watershed approach, the impact on conventional gas drillers and the
mandatory recycling provision within the proposed regulation.
Clarification was provided by the Department, summarizing the intent
of the watershed based approach. This included an explanation of
what was deemed an existing discharge and further clarification that
only the additional load above baseline would be subject to the rule
should the total loading be more than the 5,000 pounds in mass
loading the Department has determined to be de minimis.
Discussion on the
impacts to the oil and gas industry, particularly the conventional
well drillers was also significant. The Department clarified
its intent that existing centralized wastewater treatment
facilities, in particular those that treat conventional drilling
wastewater, are considered as existing facilities and as such, can
continue to accept oil and gas wastewater at levels currently
approved. Finally, discussion focused on the provision
within the regulation that would require the recycling or reuse of
oil and gas wastewater that contained concentrations of less than
30,000 mg/l TDS. WRAC members noted that this will negatively impact
both conventional and Marcellus drillers and should be revised or
removed from the regulation. Specifically, the implementation date
of the regulation and the subsequent impact that would have on the
industry should the recycling provision remain was noted.
The Department
agreed to continue working to address the concerns of WRAC members
and the stakeholders they represent, including further examination
of the implementation date. With the expected continued efforts of
the department noted, WRAC concurred unanimously to move the revised
regulation forward to the EQB. The motion that carried was:
“WRAC appreciates
all of the Department's efforts to respond to our comments and
improve the regulation. WRAC believes that the current draft of the
regulation is substantially improved over the draft we reviewed in
July of 2009, and we understand that additional improvements will be
made based on our comments today. Although some of the individual
WRAC members continue to have significant concerns about the
regulation and whether it should proceed without an advance notice
of final rulemaking, in light of the progress and efforts made to
date and in light of the department's desire to proceed with the
regulation, the consensus of the Committee is that the regulation
should proceed for final consideration by the EQB.”
|
Executive Summary - PA Oil and Gas Well Casing and Cementing -
Amendments to Chapter 78
May 19, 2010 Pennsylvania EQB
Meeting Agenda
The proposed
rulemaking would update existing requirements regarding the
drilling, casing, cementing, testing, monitoring and plugging of
oil and gas wells, and the protection of water supplies. The new
and amended sections are §§78.1, .51, .52, .71-.73, .81-.85,
.88, .89, .91-.96, .121 and .122. The proposed modifications
include updated material specifications and performance testing
and revised design, construction, operational, monitoring,
plugging, water supply replacement, and gas migration reporting
requirements. The additional requirements will minimize gas
migration and will provide an increased degree of protection for
both public and private water supplies.
With the
development of the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania, the
potential exists for natural gas to migrate from the wellbore
(via either improperly constructed or old, deteriorated wells).
This stray gas may adversely affect water supplies, as well as
accumulate within or adjacent to structures such as residences
and businesses. If a well is not properly constructed and
operated there could be potential threat of a fire or explosion.
These situations represent a threat to public safety, health and
welfare.
Properly
cementing and casing a well is critical to preventing gas
migration. The updated casing and cementing requirements will
provide an increased degree of protection for homeowners and
water supplies. The proposed construction standards will align
Pennsylvania’s regulations with other states’ rules as well as
current industry standards. Casing pressure tests will detect
deficiencies before a well could create a potential safety or
environmental problem. Minimizing annular pressure will reduce
the potential for gas migration. The new quarterly inspections
and annual reporting will result in early detection of possible
well integrity problems before impacts to the environment or
public safety occur. The proposed regulations also outline the
procedures the operator and the Department will utilize if there
is a reported gas migration event.
Prior to
drilling a well, operators will now be required to develop a
casing and cementing plan that shows how the well will be
drilled and completed. Use of centralizers (which keep the
casing centered in the well bore) must be used at prescribed
locations to ensure that cement is evenly distributed between
the casing and the well bore. Cement meeting ASTM criteria for
oil and gas wells must be used. Used or welded casing must be
pressure tested as well as casing strings attached to heavy duty
blow-out preventers. Documentation of the cement quality and
cementing practices used at the well must be available for
Department inspection.
Operators
must inspect all of their wells quarterly and report the
findings of the inspections to the Department annually. If
defective casing, evidence of leaks, or if excessive pressure
within the well bore is discovered, the operator must
immediately notify the Department and take corrective action.
The Oil and
Gas Act requires any operator who contaminates or diminishes a
water supply to restore or replace the supply with one that is
adequate in quantity and quality for the purposes served. Case
law on these requirements has defined when an operator must
provide compensation for increased operation and maintenance
costs and for what duration. The regulations codify these and
other relevant holdings to clearly describe the operator’s
responsibility. The regulations also limit the operator’s duty
to restore the quality of the supply to Safe Drinking Water Act
standards.
The new
regulations impose a duty on operators to immediately investigate a
gas migration complaint and to notify the Department if they receive
such a complaint. If natural gas is found at elevated levels the
operator must immediately notify emergency responders and initiate
mitigation measures.
The regulations
revise well plugging standards to require operators to plug wells
through the producing formation rather than setting the cement plug
immediately above the formation. This practice will better ensure
that any residual gas or oil does not somehow channel through the
plug as the cement is setting.
The proposed
rulemaking was presented to the Oil and Gas Technical Advisory Board
(TAB) for their consideration on September 17, 2009. Because of the
scope of the changes, TAB requested additional time to review and
provide comment. As part of their review, TAB formed a technical
committee with representatives from various companies, trade groups
and consultants. Since the initial meeting in September, the
Department has met with TAB and their subcommittee on October 28,
2009, January 14, 2010, January 21, 2010 and March 25, 2010.
In addition to
TAB’s input, the Department received input from industry
representatives, consultants and environmental groups. On January
30, 2010 the Department published an Advanced Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking for a 30 day comment period. The Department received
comments from 87 individuals representing industry, consultants and
environmental groups. The current proposal is based on the comments
received during the public comment period and comments submitted by
TAB members. At its March 25, 2010, meeting, TAB voted unanimously
to recommend that the EQB offer these regulations as a proposed
rulemaking.
The rulemaking
will become effective upon publication in the Pennsylvania
Bulletin, which is anticipated to occur in Fall 2010. The
Department recommends a 30-day public comment period for the
proposed rulemaking. No public meetings are planned.
|
Annex A -
Title 25.
Environmental Protection
Part I. Department
of Environmental Protection
Subpart C.
Protection of Natural Resources
- Article I. Land
Resources - CHAPTER 78. OIL
AND GAS WELLS
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 78.1.
Definitions.
(a)
The words and terms defined in section 103 of the act (58 P. S.
§ 601.103), section 2 of the Coal and Gas Resource Coordination
Act (58 P. S. § 502), section 2 of the Oil and Gas Conservation
Law (58 P. S. § 402), section 103 of the Solid Waste Management
Act (35 P. S. § 6018.103) and section 1 of The Clean Stream Law
(35 P. S. § 691.1), have the meanings set forth in those
statutes when the terms are used in this chapter.
(b)
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have
the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise:
* * * * *
Casing seat—The
depth to which the surface casing or coal protection casing
[is run] or intermediate casing is set. In wells
without surface casing, the surface casing seat
shall be considered to be equal to 50 feet
below the deepest fresh groundwater [the depth of casing
which is normal for wells in the area].
* * * * *
Cement—A mixture of
materials for bonding or sealing that attains a 7-day maximum
permeability of 0.01 millidarcies and a 24-hour compressive
strength of at least 500 psi in accordance with applicable
[API] standards and specifications.
Cement job log
– a written record that documents the
actual procedures and
specifications of the cementing
operation. The record must include the type of cement with
additives, the volume, yield and density in pounds per gallon of
the cement and the amount of cement returned to the surface, if
any. Cementing procedural information must include a description
of the pumping rates in bbls per minute, pressures in psi, time
in minutes and sequence of events during the cementing
operation.
1
* * * * *
Conductor pipe
– a short string of large-diameter casing used to stabilize
the top of the wellbore in shallow unconsolidated
formations.
* * * * *
Intermediate casing
– a string of casing other than production casing that is
used in the wellbore to isolate, stabilize or provide
well control to a greater depth than that provided by the
surface casing or coal protection casing.
* * * * *
[Retrievable—When
used in conjunction with surface casing, coal protective casing
or production casing, the casing that can be removed after
exerting a prudent effort to pull the casing while applying a
pulling force at least equal to the casing weight plus 5000
pounds or 120% of the casing weight, whichever is greater.]
* * * * *
Surface
Casing—[A string of pipe which extends from the surface
and that segregates and protects fresh groundwater and
stabilizes the hole]. Casing used to isolate the wellbore
from fresh groundwater and to prevent the escape or migration of
gas, oil and other fluids from the well bore into fresh
groundwater. The surface casing is also commonly referred to as
the water string or water casing.
* * * * *
Subchapter C. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
§ 78.51. Protection of
water supplies.
(a) A well
operator who affects a public or private water supply by
pollution or diminution shall restore or replace the affected
supply with an alternate source of water adequate in quantity
and quality for the purposes served by the supply as
determined by the Department.
* * * * *
(d) [The operator shall
affirmatively demonstrate to the Department’s satisfaction that
the quality of the restored or replaced water supply to be used
for human consumption is at least equal to the quality of the
water supply before it was affected by the operator. If the
quality of the water supply before it was affected by the
2
operator cannot be
affirmatively established, the operator shall demonstrate that
the concentrations of substances in the restored or replaced
water supply do not exceed the primary and secondary maximum
contaminant levels established under § 109.202 (relating to
State MCLs and treatment technique requirements).] A restored
or replaced water supply shall include any well, spring, public
water system or other supply approved by the Department, which
meets the criteria for adequacy as follows:
(1)
Reliability, cost, maintenance and control. A restored or
replaced water supply, at a minimum, must:
(i) Be
as reliable as the previous water supply.
(ii) Be as permanent as
the previous water supply.
(iii) Not require
excessive maintenance.
(iv)
Provide the owner and the user with as much control and
accessibility as exercised over the previous water supply.
(v)
Not result in increased costs to operate and maintain. If the
operating and maintenance costs of the restored or replaced
water supply are increased, the operator shall provide for
permanent payment of the increased operating and maintenance
costs of the restored or replaced water supply.
(2)
Quality. The quality of a restored or replaced water
supply will be deemed
adequate if it meets the standards established pursuant to the
Pennsylvania Safe Drinking Water Act (35 P. S. § §
721.1—721.17), or is comparable to the unaffected water supply
if that water supply did not meet these standards.
(3) Adequate
quantity. A restored or replaced water supply will be deemed
adequate in quantity if it meets one of the following
as determined by the Department:
(i)
It delivers the amount of water necessary to satisfy the water
user’s needs and the demands of any reasonably foreseeable uses.
(ii)
It is established through a connection to a public water supply
system which is capable of delivering the amount of
water necessary to satisfy the water user’s needs and the
demands of any reasonably foreseeable uses.
(iii)
For purposes of this paragraph and with respect to agricultural
water supplies, the term reasonably foreseeable uses
includes the reasonable expansion of use where the water supply
available prior to drilling exceeded the actual use.
3
(4)
Water source serviceability. Replacement of a water supply
includes providing plumbing, conveyance, pumping or
auxiliary equipment and facilities necessary for the surface
landowner or water purveyor to utilize the water supply.
(e) If the
water supply is for uses other than human consumption, the
operator shall demonstrate to the Department’s satisfaction that
the restored or replaced water supply is adequate for the
purposes served by the supply.
(f) [The
oil or gas well operator’s duty to replace or restore a water
supply includes providing plumbing, conveyance, pumping or
auxiliary equipment and facilities necessary for the surface
landowner or water purveyor to utilize the water supply.]
[(g)]
Tank trucks or bottled water are acceptable only as temporary
water replacement for a period approved by the Department and do
not relieve the operator of the obligation to provide a restored
or replaced water supply.
[(h)]
(g) If the well operator and the landowner, water
purveyor or affected person are unable to reach agreement on the
means for restoring or replacing the water supply, the
Department or either party may request a conference under
section 501 of the act (58 P. S. § 601.501).
(h) A well operator who
receives notice from a landowner, water purveyor or affected
person that a water supply has been affected by pollution or
diminution, shall report receipt of such notice to the
Department within 10 calendar days of receiving the notice.
§
78.52. Predrilling
or prealteration survey.
(a) A well
operator who wishes to preserve its defense under section
208(d)(1) of the act (58 P. S. § 601.208(d)(1)) that the
pollution of a water supply existed prior to the drilling or
alteration of the well shall [cause] conduct a
predrilling or prealteration survey [to be conducted] in
accordance with this section.
* * * * *
(d) An
operator electing to preserve its defenses under section
208(d)(1) of the act shall provide a copy of the results of the
survey to the Department and the landowner or water purveyor
within 10-calendar days of receipt [being notified by
the Department to submit a copy] of the results.
* * * * *
4
Subchapter D. WELL DRILLING,
OPERATION AND PLUGGING
GENERAL
Sec.
78.71. Use of safety
devices—well casing. 78.72. Use of safety devices—blow-out
prevention equipment. 78.73. General provision for well
construction and operation. 78.74. Venting of gas. 78.75.
Alternative methods.
78.75a. Area of
alternative methods. 78.76. Drilling within a gas
storage reservoir area.
78.77. Wells in a hydrogen
sulfide area. 78.78 Pillar permit applications.
CASING AND CEMENTING
78.81.
General provisions. 78.82. Use of conductor pipe. 78.83. Surface
and coal protective casing and cementing procedures.
78.83a. Casing and cementing plan. 78.83b. Casing and cementing
– lost circulation. 78.83c. Intermediate and production casing.
78.84. Casing standards. 78.85. Cement standards. 78.86.
Defective casing or cementing. 78.87. Gas storage reservoir
protective casing and cementing procedures.
OPERATING WELLS
78.88.
Mechanical integrity of operating wells. 78.89. Gas migration
response. .
* * * * *
5
Subchapter D. WELL DRILLING,
OPERATION AND PLUGGING
GENERAL
§ 78.71. Use of safety
devices—well casing.
(a) The
operator shall equip the well with one or more strings of casing
of sufficient cemented length and strength to
attach blow-out prevention equipment and prevent
blowouts, explosions, fires and casing failures during
installation, completion and operation.
* * * * *
§
78.72. Use of safety devices—blow-out prevention
equipment.
(a) The
operator shall use blow-out prevention equipment [when well
head pressures or natural open flows are anticipated at the well
site that may result in a blow-out or when the operator is
drilling in an area where there is no prior knowledge of the
pressures or natural open flows to be encountered.] in the
following circumstances:
(1) When drilling a well that is intended to produce
natural gas from the Marcellus Shale formation;
(2) When well head pressures or natural open flows are
anticipated at the well site that may result in a loss of well
control;
(3) When the operator is drilling in an area where there
is no prior knowledge of the pressures or natural open flows to
be encountered;
(4) On wells regulated by the Oil and Gas Conservation Law
(58 P.S. §§ 401 – 409);
(5) When drilling within 200 feet of a building.
(b) Blow-out
prevention equipment used shall be in good working condition at
all times.
(c)
Controls for the blow-out preventer shall be accessible to allow
actuation of the equipment. Additional controls for a
blow-out preventer with a pressure rating of greater than 3,000
psi not associated with the rig hydraulic system shall be
located away from the drilling rig such that the blow-out
preventer can be actuated if control of the well is lost.
[(c)] (d) * * * *
*
6
[(d)]
(e) The operator shall conduct a complete test of the
ram type blow-out preventer and related equipment for both
pressure and ram operation before placing it in service on the
well. The operator shall test the annular type blow-out
preventer in accordance with the manufacturer’s published
instructions, or the instructions of a professional engineer,
prior to the device being placed in service. Blow-out
prevention equipment that fails the test shall not be used until
it is repaired and passes the test.
[(e)]
(f) When the equipment is in service, the operator shall
visually inspect blow-out prevention equipment during each tour
of drilling operation and during actual drilling operations test
the pipe rams for closure daily and the blind rams for closure
on each round trip. When more than one round trip is made in a
day, one daily closure test for blind rams is sufficient.
Testing shall be conducted in accordance with American Petroleum
Institute publication API RP53, ‘‘API Recommended Practice for
Blowout Prevention Equipment Systems for Drilling Wells.’’ The
operator shall record the results of the inspection and closure
test in the drillers log before the end of the tour.
Blow-out prevention equipment that is not in good working order
shall be repaired or replaced immediately and re-tested prior to
the resumption of drilling.
(g) All
lines, valves and fittings between the closing unit and the
blow-out preventer stack shall be flame resistant and have a
rated working pressure that meets or exceeds the requirements of
the blow-out preventer system.
[(f)]
(h) During drilling when conditions are such that the
use of a blowout preventer can be anticipated, there shall be
present on the [rig floor a certified] well site an
individual [responsible to] who the operator has
determined is trained and competent in the use of the blow-out
prevention equipment. Satisfactory completion of [a
United States Geologic Survey (U.S.G.S.)] a[n approved]
well control course by the [American Petroleum
Institute,] Independent Association of Drilling Contractors
or equivalent study shall be deemed adequate
[certification] for purposes of this subsection.
[(g)] (i) * * * *
*
[(h)] (j) * * * *
*
§ 78.73. General provision
for well construction and operation.
(a) The
operator shall construct and operate the well in accordance with
this chapter and ensure that the integrity of the well is
maintained and health, safety, environment and property are
protected.
[(a)]
(b) The operator shall prevent gas [and other fluids
from lower formations from entering fresh groundwater.],
oil, brine, completion and servicing fluids, and any
7
other
fluids from below the casing seat from entering fresh
groundwater and prevent pollution or diminution of fresh
groundwater.
[(b)]
(c) After a well has been completed, recompleted,
reconditioned or altered the operator shall prevent shut-in
pressure [or] and producing back pressure at the
surface casing seat, [or] coal protective casing seat
or intermediate casing seat when the intermediate casing is
used in conjunction with the surface casing to isolate fresh
groundwater from exceeding 80 percent (80%) of
the hydrostatic pressure of the surrounding fresh
groundwater system in accordance with the following formula. The
maximum allowable shut-in pressure [or] and
producing back pressure to be exerted at the [surface casing
seat, or coal protective] casing seat may not exceed the
[hydrostatic] pressure calculated as follows: Maximum
pressure = (0.8 x 0.433 psi/foot)
multiplied by (casing length in feet).
[(c)]
(d) After a well has been completed, recompleted,
reconditioned or altered, if the shut-in pressure or producing
back pressure exceeds the [hydrostatic] pressure at the
surface casing seat, coal protective casing as calculated in
subsection [(b)] (c), the operator shall take
action to prevent the migration of gas and other fluids from
lower formations into fresh groundwater. To meet this standard
the operator may cement or install on a packer sufficient
intermediate or production casing or take other actions approved
by the Department. This section does not apply during testing
for mechanical integrity in accordance with State or Federal
requirements.
(e) Excess gas encountered
during drilling, completion or stimulation shall be flared,
captured or diverted away from the drilling rig in a manner that
does not create a hazard to the public health or safety.
(f)
Except for gas storage wells, the well must be equipped with a
check valve to prevent backflow from the pipelines into the
well.
* * * * *
§ 78.75a. Area of
alternative methods.
(a) The Department may
designate an area of alternative methods if the Department
determines that well drilling requirements beyond those provided
in this chapter are necessary to drill, operate or plug a well
in a safe and environmentally protective manner.
(b) To establish an area
of alternative methods, the Department shall publish a notice in
the Pennsylvania Bulletin of the proposed area of
alternative methods and provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on the proposal. After reviewing any
comments received on the proposal, the Department shall publish
a final designation of the area and required alternative
methods in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
8
(c) Wells drilled within
an area of alternative methods established pursuant to
subsection (b) must meet the requirements specified by the
Department unless the operator obtains approval from the
Department to drill, operate or plug the well in a different
manner that is at least as safe and protective of the
environment as the requirements of the area of alternative
methods.
§
78.76. Drilling within a gas storage reservoir area.
(a) An operator proposing to
drill a well within a gas storage reservoir area or a reservoir
protective area to produce gas or oil shall forward by certified
mail a copy of the well location plat, the drilling, casing and
cementing plan and the anticipated date drilling will commence
to the gas storage reservoir operator and to the
Department for approval by the Department and shall
submit proof of notification to the Department with the well
permit application.
* * * * *
CASING AND CEMENTING
* * * * *
[(c)
Casing and cementing standards in § § 78.83—78.85 (relating to
surface and coal protective casing and cementing procedures;
casing standards; and cement standards) apply to surface casing
and coal protective casing but do not apply to production
casing.]
§ 78.82 Use
of conductor pipe.
If the
operator installs conductor pipe in the well, the [operator
may not remove the pipe] following provisions shall apply:
(i)
The operator may not
remove the pipe;
(ii)
Conductor pipe shall be
installed in a manner that prevents infiltration of surface
water or fluids from the operation into groundwater;
(iii)
Conductor pipe must be
made of steel unless a different material is approved for use by
the Department.
§ 78.83.
Surface and coal protective casing and cementing procedures.
(a) For wells drilled,
altered, reconditioned or recompleted after [effective date],
surface casing or any casing functioning as a water protection
casing must not be utilized as production casing unless one of
the following applies:
9
(1)
In oil wells where the
operator does not produce any gas generated by the well and the
annulus between the surface casing and the production pipe is
left open;
(2)
The operator demonstrates
that the pressure in the well bore at the casing seat is no
greater than the pressure permitted by § 78.73(c) and
demonstrates through a pressure test or other method approved by
the Department that all gas and fluids will be contained within
the well.
[(a)]
(b) If the well is to be equipped with threaded and
coupled casing, the operator shall drill a hole so that the
diameter is at least 1 inch greater than the outside diameter of
the casing collar to be installed. If the well is to be equipped
with plain-end welded casing, the operator shall drill a hole so
that the diameter is at least 1 inch greater than the outside
diameter of the [casing tube] centralizer band.
[(b)]
(c) [Except as provided in subsection (c) , t]The
operator shall drill to approximately 50 feet below the deepest
fresh groundwater or at least 50 feet into consolidated rock,
whichever is deeper, and immediately set and permanently cement
a string of surface casing to that depth. The surface hole
shall be drilled using air, freshwater, or freshwater based
drilling fluid. The surface casing seat shall be set in
consolidated rock. When drilling a new well or redrilling an
existing well, the operator shall install at least one
centralizer within 50 feet of the casing seat and then install a
centralizer in intervals no greater than every 150 feet above
the first centralizer.
[(c) If no
fresh groundwater is being utilized as a source of drinking
water within a 1,000-foot radius of the well, the operator may
set and permanently cement a single string of surface casing
through all water zones, including fresh, brackish and salt
water zones. Prior to penetrating zones known to contain, or
likely containing, oil or gas, the operator shall install and
permanently cement the string of casing in a manner that
segregates the various waters.]
* * * * *
(f) If additional fresh
groundwater is encountered in drilling below the permanently
cemented surface casing, the operator shall protect the
additional fresh groundwater by installing and cementing a
subsequent string of casing or other procedures approved by the
Department to completely isolate and protect fresh groundwater.
The string of casing may also penetrate zones bearing salty or
brackish water with cement in the annular space being used to
segregate the various zones. Sufficient cement shall be used to
cement the casing at least 20 feet into the permanently cemented
surface casing.
(g) The
operator shall set and cement a coal protective string of casing
through workable coal seams. The base of the coal protective
casing shall be at least 30 feet below the lowest workable coal
seam. The operator shall install at least two
centralizers. One
10
centralizer shall be within 50 feet of the casing seat and the
second centralizer shall be within 100 feet of the surface.
(h)
Unless an alternative method has been approved by the Department
in accordance with § 78.75 (relating to Alternative methods),
[W]when a well is drilled through a coal seam at a
location where the coal has been removed or when a well is
drilled through a coal pillar, the operator shall drill
to a depth of at least 30 feet but no more than 50 feet deeper
than the bottom of the coal seam. The operator shall set and
cement a coal protection string of casing to this depth. The
operator shall equip the casing with a cement basket or other
similar device above and as close to the top of the coal seam as
practical. The bottom of the casing shall be equipped with an
appropriate device designed to prevent deformation of the bottom
of the casing. The interval from the bottom of the casing to the
bottom of the coal seam shall be filled with cement either by
the balance method or by the displacement method. Cement shall
be placed on top of the basket between the wall of the hole and
the outside of the casing by pumping from the surface. If the
operator penetrates more than one coal seam from which the coal
has been removed, the operator shall protect each seam with a
separate string of casing that is set and cemented or with a
single string of casing which is stage cemented so that each
coal seam is protected as described in this subsection. The
operator shall cement the well to isolate workable coal seams
from each other.
* * * * *
(j) If it is
anticipated that cement used to permanently cement the surface
casing can not be circulated to the surface a cement basket may
be installed immediately above the depth of the
anticipated [last] lost circulation zone. The
casing shall be permanently cemented by the displacement method.
Additional cement may be added above the cement basket, if
necessary, by pumping through a pour string from the surface to
fill the annular space.
§ 78.83a. Casing and
cementing plan.
(a) The
operator shall prepare and maintain a casing and cementing plan
showing how the well will be drilled and completed. The plan
must demonstrate compliance with this subchapter and include the
following information:
(1) The anticipated depth and thickness of any producing
formation, expected pressures, and anticipated fresh groundwater
zones;
(2) Diameter of the well bore;
(3) Casing type, whether the casing is new or used, depth,
diameter, wall thickness and burst pressure rating;
(4) Cement type, yield, additives, and estimated amount;
11
(5) Estimated location of centralizers;
(6) Alternative methods or materials as required by the
Department as a condition of the well permit.
(b) The
plan must be available at the well site for review by the
Department.
(c)
Upon request, the operator shall provide a copy of the well
specific casing and cementing plan to the Department for review
and approval.
(d) Any revisions to the
plan made as a result of on-site modification shall be
documented in the plan by the operator and be available for
review by the Department.
§ 78.83b. Casing and
cementing – lost circulation.
(a) If
cement used to permanently cement the surface or coal protective
casing is not circulated to the surface despite pumping a volume
of cement equal to or greater than 120% of the calculated
annular space, the operator shall notify the Department and meet
one of the following requirements:
(1)
Run an additional string
of casing at least 50 feet deeper than the surface casing and
cement the second string of casing back to the seat of the
surface or coal protective casing and vent the annulus of the
additional casing string to the atmosphere at all times unless
closed for well testing or maintenance. Shut-in pressure on the
casing seat of the second string of casing must not exceed the
requirements of section 78.73(c).
(2)
If the additional string
of casing is the production casing, the operator shall set the
production casing on a packer in a competent formation below the
surface casing seat, and vent the annulus of the production
casing to the atmosphere at all times unless closed for well
testing or maintenance.
(3)
Run production casing at
least to the top of the formation that is being produced and
cement the production casing to the surface.
(4)
Produce oil but not gas
and leave the annulus between the surface casing and the
production pipe open.
12
(b) If
cement used to permanently cement the surface or coal protective
casing is not circulated to the surface, the Department may
require the operator to determine the amount of casing that was
cemented by logging or other suitable method.
§ 78.83c. Intermediate and
production casing.
(a) Except as provided in
§ 78.72 (relating to Use of safety devices – blow-out
prevention equipment), intermediate and production casing
must be cemented according to this section.
(b) If the well is to be
equipped with an intermediate casing, the casing must be
cemented from the casing seat to a point at least 500 feet above
the seat. If any producing horizon is open to the well bore
above the casing seat, the casing must be cemented from the
casing seat up to a point at least 500 feet above the top of the
shallowest productive horizon, or to a point at least 200 feet
above the shoe of the next shallower casing string that was set
and cemented in the well. The intermediate casing may be
perforated to produce gas or oil if a shoe test demonstrates a
pressure gradient greater than 0.465 psi/ft multiplied by casing
length in feet.
(c) Except as provided for
in § 78.83 (relating to surface and coal protective casing and
cementing procedures), each well must be equipped with
production casing. The production string may be set on a packer
or cemented in place. If the production casing is cemented in
place, cement must be placed by the displacement method with
sufficient cement to fill the annular space to the surface or to
a point at least 500 feet above the production casing seat.
§ 78.84.
Casing standards.
(a)
The operator shall install
casing that can withstand the effects of tension, and prevent
leaks, burst and collapse during its installation,
cementing and subsequent drilling and producing operations.
(b) Surface casing must be
a string of new pipe with a pressure rating that is at least
20 percent greater than the anticipated maximum pressure
to which the surface casing will be exposed.
(c) Used casing may be
approved for use as surface, intermediate or production
casing but must be pressure tested after cementing and before
continuation of drilling. A passing pressure test is holding the
anticipated maximum pressure to which it will be exposed for 30
minutes with not more than a 10 percent decrease in pressure.
(d) New or used plain end
casing, except when being used as drive pipe, conductor, or as a
casing string prior to setting and cementing surface casing,
that is welded together for use must meet the following
requirements:
13
(1) It must pass a pressure test by holding the
anticipated maximum pressure to which the casing will be exposed
for 30 minutes with not more than a 10 percent decrease in
pressure. The operator shall notify the Department at least 24
hours before conducting the test. The test results shall be
entered on the drilling log.
(2) It shall be welded using at least three passes with
the joint cleaned between each pass.
(3) It shall be welded by a person trained and certified
in the applicable American Petroleum Institute’s standard for
welding casing and pipe or an equivalent training and
certification program as approved by the Department. A person
with 10 or more years of experience welding casing as of
[effective date] who registers with the Department within nine
months of the effective date of this subsection is deemed to be
certified.
[(b) The
operator shall equip the casing string with appropriate
equipment to center the casing through the hole in fresh
groundwater zones. This equipment is not required when existing
hole conditions such as caving or crookedness might cause loss
of the well or result in a defective cement job.]
[(c)]
(e) When casing through a workable coal seam, the
operator shall install coal protective casing that has a minimum
wall thickness of 0.23 inches.
(f) Casing which is
attached to a blow-out preventer with a pressure rating of
greater than 3,000 psi shall be pressure tested. A passing
pressure test must be holding 120 percent of the highest
expected working pressure of the casing string being tested, for
30 minutes with not more than a 10 percent decrease.
Certification of the pressure test shall be confirmed by entry
and signature of the person performing the test on the driller’s
log.
§ 78.85.
Cement standards.
(a)
When cementing surface casing, coal protective casing and
intermediate casing when the intermediate casing is used in
conjunction with the surface casing to isolate fresh groundwater,
[T]the operator shall use cement that [will
resist degradation by chemical and physical conditions in the
well.] meets or exceeds the ASTM International C 150, Type I,
II or III Standard or API Specification 10. The cement must
also:
(1) Secure the casing in the well bore;
(2) Isolate the well bore from fresh groundwater;
(3) Contain any pressure from drilling, completion and
production;
14
(4) Protect the casing from corrosion;
(5) Resist degradation by the chemical and physical
conditions in the well;
(6) Prevent gas flow in the annulus.
(b) [The
operator shall permit the cement to set to a minimum compressive
strength of 350 pounds per square inch (psi) in accordance with
the American Petroleum Institute’s API Specification 10. The
operator shall permit the cement to set for a minimum period of
8 hours prior to the resumption of actual drilling.] After
the casing cement is placed behind surface casing and
intermediate casing when the intermediate casing is used in
conjunction with the surface casing to isolate fresh
groundwater, the operator shall permit the cement to set to a
minimum designed compressive strength of 350 pounds per square
inch (psi) at the casing seat.
(c)
After the casing cement is placed and cementing operations are
complete, the casing may not be disturbed for a minimum of eight
(8) hours by:
(1) Releasing
pressure on the cement head, if float equipment check valves
did not hold or float equipment was not equipped with
check valves;
(2) Nippling up on or in conjunction to the casing;
(3) Slacking off by the rig supporting the casing in the
cement sheath; or
(4) Running drill pipe, wireline, or other mechanical
devices into or out of the wellbore.
[(c)]
(d) Where special cement or additives are used, the
operator may request approval from the Department to reduce the
cement setting time specified in subsection [(b)] (d).
(e) The operator shall
notify the Department a minimum of one day before
cementing of the surface casing begins, unless the cementing
operation begins within 72 hours of commencement of drilling.
(f) A copy of the cement
job log must be available at the well site for inspection by
the Department during drilling operations. The cement job
log shall be maintained by the operator after drilling
operations for at least five years and be made available to the
Department upon request.
* * * * *
15
OPERATING WELLS
§
78.88. Mechanical integrity of operating wells.
(a)
Except for wells regulated under Subchapter H (relating to
Underground gas storage), the operator shall inspect each
operating well at least quarterly to ensure it is in compliance
with the well construction and operating requirements of this
chapter and the Act. The results of the inspections shall be
recorded and retained by the operator for at least five years
and shall be available for review by the Department and the coal
owner or operator.
(b) At
a minimum, inspections must determine:
(1) The
well-head pressure or water level measurement;
(2) The
open flow on the annulus of the production casing or the annulus
pressure if the annulus is shut in;
(3) If
there is evidence of gas escaping from the well and the amount
escaping, using measurement or best estimate of quantity;
(4) If
there is evidence of progressive corrosion, rusting or other
signs of equipment deterioration.
(c) For
structurally sound wells in compliance with §78.73(c), the
operator shall follow the reporting schedule outlined in
subsection (e).
(d) For wells exhibiting
progressive corrosion, rusting or other signs of equipment
deterioration that compromise the integrity of the well, or the
well is not in compliance with §78.73(c), the operator shall
immediately notify the Department and take corrective actions to
repair or replace defective equipment or casing or mitigate the
excess pressure on the surface casing seat, coal protective
casing seat or intermediate casing seat when the intermediate
casing is used in conjunction with the surface casing to isolate
fresh groundwater according to the following hierarchy:
(1)
The operator shall reduce
the shut-in or producing back pressure on the casing seat to
achieve compliance with § 78.73(c).
(2)
The operator shall
retrofit the well by installing production casing to reduce the
pressure on the casing seat to achieve compliance with §
78.73(c). The annular space surrounding the production casing
must be open to the atmosphere. The production casing shall be
either cemented to the surface or installed on a permanent
packer. The operator shall notify the Department at least seven
days prior to initiating the corrective measure.
16
(3)
Additional mechanical
integrity tests, including but not limited to pressure tests,
may be required by the Department to demonstrate the integrity
of the well.
(e) The operator shall submit
an annual report to the Department identifying the compliance
status of each well with the mechanical integrity requirements
of this section. The report shall be submitted on forms
prescribed by, and available from, the Department or in a
similar manner approved by the Department.
§ 78.89. Gas migration
response.
(a) When an operator or owner
is notified of or otherwise made aware of a natural gas
migration incident, the operator shall immediately notify the
Department and, if so directed by the Department, conduct an
investigation of the incident. The purpose of the investigation
is to determine the nature of the incident, assess the potential
for hazards to public health and safety, and mitigate any hazard
posed by the levels of natural gas. The operator, in conjunction
with the Department and local emergency response agencies, shall
take measures necessary to ensure public health and safety.
(b) The investigation
undertaken pursuant to subsection (a) shall include, but not be
limited to:
(1) An
interview with the complainant to obtain information about the
complaint and to assess the reported problem.
(2) A
field survey to assess the presence and concentrations of
natural gas and aerial extent of the stray natural gas.
(3)
Establishment of monitoring locations at potential sources, in
potentially impacted structures, and the subsurface.
(c) If
the level of natural gas is greater than 10 percent of the lower
explosive limit of natural gas, the operator shall:
(1)
Immediately notify the local emergency response agency, police
and fire departments and the Department;
(2)
Conduct an immediate field survey of the operator’s adjacent oil
or gas wells to assess the wells for mechanical integrity,
defective casing or cementing, and excess pressures within any
part of the well. The initial area of assessment shall include
wells within 2,500 feet and expanded to a greater distance if
necessary as determined by the Department;
(3)
Initiate mitigation controls, which may include remedial
measures, access control, advisories, evacuation, signs and
other actions;
17
(d) The operator shall take
action to correct any defect in the oil and gas wells to
mitigate the stray gas incident.
(e) The operator and owner
shall report to the Department by phone within 12 hours after
the interview with the complainant and field survey of the
natural gas levels. A follow-up report shall be filed in writing
with the Department within three days of the complaint. This
follow-up report must include the results of the investigation,
monitoring results and measures taken by the operator to repair
any defects at any of the adjacent oil and gas wells.
PLUGGING
§ 78.92. Wells in coal
areas—surface or coal protective casing is cemented.
(a) In a well
underlain by a workable coal seam, where the surface casing or
coal protective casing is cemented and the production casing is
not cemented or the production casing is not present, the owner
or operator shall plug the well as follows:
(1) The
retrievable production casing shall be removed by applying a
pulling force at least equal to the casing weight plus 5000
pounds or 120% whichever is greater. If this fails, an attempt
shall be made to separate the casing by cutting, ripping,
shooting or other method approved by the Department, and making
a second attempt to remove the casing by exerting a pulling
force equal to the casing weight plus 5,000 pounds or 120
percent of the casing weight, whichever is greater. [and the]
The well shall be filled with nonporous material from the
total depth or attainable bottom of the well, to a point 50
feet below [20 feet above the top of] the lowest
stratum bearing or having borne oil, gas or water. At this point
there shall be placed a plug of cement, which shall extend for
at least 50 feet above this stratum [that point]. Each
overlying formation bearing or having borne oil, gas or water
shall be plugged with cement a minimum of 50 feet below this
formation to a point 50 feet above this formation. The zone
between cement plugs shall be filled with nonporous material.
[Between this sealing plug and a point 20 feet above the next
higher stratum bearing or having borne oil, gas or water, the
hole shall be filled with nonporous material and at that point
there shall be placed another 50-foot plug of cement which] The
cement plugs shall be placed in a manner that will
completely seal the hole. [In like manner, the hole shall be
filled and plugged, with reference to each of the strata bearing
or having borne oil, gas or water.] The operator may treat
multiple strata as one stratum and plug as described in this
subsection with a single column of cement or other materials
approved by the Department. Where the production casing is not
retrievable, the operator shall plug that portion of the well
under § 78.91(d) (relating to general provisions).
* * * * *
(b) The owner
or operator shall plug a well, where the surface casing, coal
protective casing and production casing are cemented, as
follows:
18
* * * * *
(3) Following the plugging of
the cemented portion of the production casing, the uncemented
portion of the production casing shall be separated from the
cemented portion and retrieved by applying a pulling force at
least equal to the casing weight plus 5000 pounds or 120%
whichever is greater. If this fails, an attempt shall be made to
separate the casing by cutting, ripping, shooting or other
method approved by the Department, and making a second attempt
to remove the casing by exerting a pulling force equal to the
casing weight plus 5,000 pounds or 120 percent of the casing
weight, whichever is greater .
The maximum distance the stub
of the uncemented portion of the production casing may extend is
100 feet below the surface or coal protective casing whichever
is lower. In no case may the uncemented portion of the casing
left in the well extend through a formation bearing or having
borne oil, gas or water. Other stratum above the cemented
portion of the production casing bearing or having borne oil,
gas or water shall be plugged by filling the hole with nonporous
material to 20 feet above the stratum and setting a 50-foot plug
of cement. The operator may treat multiple strata as one stratum
and plug as described in this subsection with a single column of
cement or other material as approved by the Department. When the
uncemented portion of the production casing is not retrievable,
the operator shall plug that portion of the well under §
78.91(d).
§ 78.93.
Wells in coal areas—surface or coal
protective casing anchored with a packer or cement.
(a) In a well where the surface casing
or coal protective casing and production casing are anchored
with a packer or cement, the owner or operator shall plug the
well as follows:
(1) The retrievable production casing
shall be removed by applying a pulling force at least equal
to the casing weight plus 5000 pounds or 120% whichever is
greater. If this fails, an attempt shall be made to separate the
casing by cutting, ripping, shooting or other method approved by
the Department, and making a second attempt to remove the casing
by exerting a pulling force equal to the casing weight plus
5,000 pounds or 120 percent of the casing weight, whichever is
greater.
[and the] The
well shall be filled with nonporous
material from the total depth or attainable bottom of the well,
to a point 50 feet below [20 feet above the top of] the
lowest stratum bearing or having borne oil, gas or water. At
this point there shall be placed a plug of cement, which shall
extend for at least 50 feet above this stratum [that point].
Each overlying formation bearing or having borne oil, gas or
water shall be plugged with cement a minimum of 50 feet below
this formation to a point 50 feet above this formation. The zone
between cement plugs shall be filled with nonporous material.
[Between this sealing plug and a point 20 feet above the next
higher stratum bearing or having borne oil, gas or water, the
hole shall be filled with nonporous material and at that point
there shall be placed another 50-foot plug of cement which] The
cement plugs shall be placed in a manner that will
completely
19
seal the
hole. [In this manner, the hole shall be filled and plugged,
with reference to each of the strata bearing or having borne
oil, gas or water.] The operator may treat multiple strata
as one stratum and plug as described in this subsection with a
single column of cement or other material as approved by the
Department. When the production casing is not retrievable, the
operator shall plug this portion of the well under § 78.91(d)
(relating to general provisions).
(2) The well
shall then be filled with nonporous material to a point
approximately 200 feet below the lowest workable coal seam, or
surface or coal protective casing seat, whichever is deeper.
Beginning at this point a 100-foot plug of cement shall be
installed.
(3) After it
has been established that the surface casing or coal protective
casing is free and can be retrieved, the surface or coal
protective casing shall be retrieved by applying a pulling
force at least equal to the casing weight plus 5000 pounds or
120% whichever is greater. If this fails, an attempt shall be
made to separate the casing by cutting, ripping, shooting or
other method approved by the Department, and making a second
attempt to remove the casing by exerting a pulling force equal
to the casing weight plus 5,000 pounds or 120 percent of the
casing weight, whichever is greater. [and a] A string of
casing with an outside diameter of not less than 4 1/2 inches
for gas wells, or not less than 2 inches for oil wells, shall be
run to the top of the 100-foot plug described in paragraph (2)
and cemented to the surface.
* * * * *
§ 78.94. Wells in noncoal
areas—surface casing is not cemented or not present.
(a) The owner
or operator shall plug a noncoal well, where the surface casing
and production casing are not cemented, or is not present as
follows:
(1) The
retrievable production casing shall be removed by applying a
pulling force at least equal to the casing weight plus 5000
pounds or 120% whichever is greater. If this fails, an attempt
shall be made to separate the casing by cutting, ripping,
shooting or other method approved by the Department, and making
a second attempt to remove the casing by exerting a pulling
force equal to the casing weight plus 5,000 pounds or 120
percent of the casing weight, whichever is greater. The well
shall be filled with nonporous material from the total depth or
attainable bottom of the well, to a point 50 feet below [20
feet above the top of] the lowest stratum bearing or having
borne oil, gas or water. At this point there shall be placed a
plug of cement, which shall extend for at least 50 feet above
this stratum [that point]. Each overlying formation bearing or
having borne oil, gas or water shall be plugged with cement a
minimum of 50 feet below this formation to a point 50 feet above
this formation. The zone between cement plugs shall be filled
with nonporous material. [Between this sealing plug and a point
20 feet above the next higher stratum bearing or having borne
oil, gas or water, the hole shall be filled with nonporous
material and at that point there shall be placed another 50-foot
plug of cement which] The cement plugs shall be placed in a
manner that will completely seal the hole. [The hole
shall be filled
20
and
plugged, with reference to each of the strata bearing or having
borne oil, gas or water.] The operator may treat multiple
strata as one stratum and plug as described in this paragraph
with a single column of cement or other materials as approved by
the Department. When the production casing is not retrievable,
the operator shall plug this portion of the well under §
78.91(d) (relating to general provisions).
(2) After
plugging strata bearing or having borne oil, gas or water, the
well shall be filled with nonporous material to approximately
100 feet below the surface casing seat and there shall be placed
another plug of cement or other equally nonporous material
approved by the Department extending at least 50 feet above that
point.
(3) After
setting the uppermost 50-foot plug, the retrievable surface
casing shall be removed by applying a pulling force at least
equal to the casing weight plus 5000 pounds or 120% whichever is
greater. If this fails, an attempt shall be made to separate the
casing by cutting, ripping, shooting or other method approved by
the Department, and making a second attempt to remove the casing
by exerting a pulling force equal to the casing weight plus
5,000 pounds or 120 percent of the casing weight, whichever is
greater. [and the] The hole shall be filled from the top of
the 50-foot plug to the surface with nonporous material other
than gel. If the surface casing is not retrievable, the hole
shall be filled from the top of the 50-foot plug to the surface
with a noncementing material.
* * * * *
§ 78.95. Wells in noncoal
areas—surface casing is cemented.
(a) The owner
or operator shall plug a well, where the surface casing is
cemented and the production casing is not cemented or not
present, as follows:
(1) The
retrievable production casing shall be removed by applying a
pulling force at least equal to the casing weight plus 5000
pounds or 120% whichever is greater. If this fails, an attempt
shall be made to separate the casing by cutting, ripping,
shooting or other method approved by the Department, and making
a second attempt to remove the casing by exerting a pulling
force equal to the casing weight plus 5,000 pounds or 120
percent of the casing weight, whichever is greater. [and] T[t]he
well shall be filled with nonporous material from the total
depth or attainable bottom of the well, to a point 50 feet
below [20 feet above the top of] the lowest stratum bearing
or having borne oil, gas or water. At this point there shall be
placed a plug of cement, which shall extend for at least 50 feet
above this stratum [that point]. Each overlying formation
bearing or having borne oil, gas or water shall be plugged with
cement a minimum of 50 feet below this formation to a point 50
feet above this formation. The zone between cement plugs shall
be filled with nonporous material. [Between this sealing plug
and a point 20 feet above the next higher stratum bearing or
having borne oil, gas or water, the hole shall be filled with
nonporous material and at that point there shall be placed
another 50-foot plug of cement] The cement plugs shall be placed
in a manner that will completely seal the hole. [The hole
shall be filled and plugged, with reference to each of the
strata bearing or having borne
21
oil, gas
or water.] The operator may treat multiple strata as one
stratum and plug as described in this subsection with a single
column of cement or other materials as approved by the
Department. When the production casing is not retrievable, the
operator shall plug this portion of the well under § 78.91(d)
(relating to general provisions).
* * * * *
§ 78.96. Marking the
location of a plugged well.
(a)
Upon the completion of plugging or replugging a well, the
operator shall erect over the plugged well a permanent marker of
concrete, metal, plastic or equally durable material [or
metal and concrete]. The marker shall extend at least 4 feet
above the ground surface and enough below the surface to make
the marker permanent. Cement may be used to hold the marker
in place provided the cement does not prevent inspection of the
adequacy of the well plugging. The permit or registration
number shall be stamped or cast or otherwise permanently affixed
to the marker. In lieu of placing the marker above the ground
surface, the marker may be buried below plow depth and shall
contain enough metal to be detected at the surface by
conventional metal detectors
* * * **
SUBCHAPTER E. WELL REPORTING
78.121. [Annual] P[p]roduction
reporting. 78.122. Well record and completion report.
78.123. Logs and additional data. 78.124. Certificate of
plugging. 78.125. Disposal and enhanced recovery well reports.
§ 78.121. [Annual]
P[p]roduction reporting.
(a) The well
operator shall submit an annual production and status report for
each well on an individual basis, on or before [March 31]
February 15 of each year. The operator of a well which
produces gas from the Marcellus shale formation shall submit a
production and status report for each well on an individual
basis, on or before February 15 and August 15 of each year.
Production shall be reported for the preceding calendar year
or in the case of a Marcellus shale well, for the preceding six
months.
When the production data is not
available to the operator on a well basis, the operator shall
report production on the most well-specific basis available. The
annual production report shall include information on the amount
and type of waste produced
22
and the
method of waste disposal or reuse. Waste information submitted
to the Department in accordance with this subsection shall
satisfy the residual waste biennial reporting requirements of §
287.52 (relating to biennial report).
(b) The [annual]
production report shall be submitted ELECTRONICALLY TO
THE DEPARMENT THROUGH ITS WEBSITE.[on forms prescribed by, and
available from, the Department or in a similar manner approved
by the Department.]
§ 78.122. Well record and
completion report.
(a) For each
well that is drilled or altered, the operator shall keep a
detailed drillers log at the well site available for inspection
until drilling is completed. Within 30 calendar days of
cessation of drilling or altering a well, the well operator
shall submit a well record to the Department on a form provided
by the Department that includes the following information:
* * * * *
(9)
A certification by the
operator that the well has been constructed in accordance with
this chapter and any permit conditions imposed by the
Department.
[(10)] 11
Other information required by the Department.
(b) Within 30
calendar days after completion of the well, the well operator
shall submit a completion report to the Department on a form
provided by the Department that includes the following
information:
(1) Name,
address and telephone number of the permittee.
(2) Name,
address and telephone number of the service companies.
(3) Permit
number and farm name and number.
(4) Township
and county.
(5)
Perforation record.
(6)
Stimulation record, including pump rates, pressure, total
volume and list of hydraulic fracturing chemicals used, the
volume of water used and identification of water sources used
pursuant to an approved water management plan.
(7) Actual
open flow production and [rock] reservoir pressure.
23
|
|